August 31, 2014

Innovative mHealth activity devices, and wearables promising to help patients stay healthy, may be proving alluring to consumers, but it’ll take much more evidence of real benefit to get doctors and providers on board.

Physicians are not only worried about accuracy of the data being collected, but are also concerned about data sharing practices, privacy issues, and technology requirements, according to a VentureBeat article.

As FierceMobileHealthcare recently reported, a new IDG Connect survey reveals the global healthcare industry is not keeping pace when it comes to mobile device security, specifically unsanctioned device and app use. Unauthorized device use and data leaks were cited by 60 percent polled as a top security concern.

The 2014 Guide to VNA: UnPAC Your Archives (Part 2)

Vendor Neutral Archives are giving PACS owners a direct path to image ownership. If you are considering a VNA solution or you want to understand how a VNA will support your enterprise image management strategy, read The VNA Guide. Learn why PACS “deconstruction” is giving way to VNA growth and know what to look for in your enterprise image management solution. Download The VNA Guide today. To learn more, download today.

Sign up for our FREE newsletter for more news like this sent to your inbox!Additional reasons for doctor wariness is the lack of a connection on how devices and data collected by apps will fit into the current healthcare reform and the role of emerging clinical data systems being developed by tech titans Google, Samsung and Apple.

All three tech giants announced healthcare efforts in the past six months, withApple debuting its HealthKitSamsung announcing a digital health initiative and Google cited as “best positioned of the three to build a consumer friendly data management platform. The latest tech partnership announced involves Apple and IBM and a strategy to marry IBM’s big data and analytic capabilities with the iPhone and iPad to develop apps for healthcare.

Each effort is banking on data to foster new services, devices and mHealth tools.

“If the healthcare system could make good use of this data, the thinking goes, doctors might be able to keep in touch with patients while they’re well, and keep them well, instead of coming in contact with them only when they get sick,” notes the VentureBeat article.

But there are formidable obstacles, according to the article. One is that doctors have little time or interest in using wellness data collected by wearable. There are also concerns about costs for additional systems and protecting data.

“Doctors would love to be excited about wearables–they’re gadget guys at heart–but their day-to-day is spent battling 30 year old fax machines to get your last lab report,” states Jeff Tangney, CEO of Doximity, in the VentureBeat report.  “For a busy doctor, the ability to use email would save more lives than a Fitbit.”

Yet that doesn’t mean the ultimate dream of weaving mHealth apps, devices, platforms and data into the day-to-day medical practice won’t happen.

“If it makes life easier for the physician by helping to keep patients healthy they’ll want to use it,” John Wald, M.D., told VentureBeat.

To learn more:
– read the VentureBeat article

Related Articles:
Mobile device security in health industry ‘immature’
Apple discusses HealthKit with hospitals, Allscripts
Google debuts SDK preview kit for developers of its Fit platform
Mobile device security in health industry ‘immature’


No comments

Be the first one to leave a comment.

Post a Comment